Talk:National Council of Iran

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on National Council of Iran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150122055103/http://www.cbs12.com:80/news/top-stories/stories/crown-prince-iran-visits-boca-raton-22072.shtml to http://www.cbs12.com/news/top-stories/stories/crown-prince-iran-visits-boca-raton-22072.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

The entire sentence about government in exile is false
Reza Pahlavi has time and time again refused the notion of establishing a government in exile, he has been vocal in refusing to claim the throne or presidency before a free democratic election. That entire sentence is misleading and a lie Kane 1371 (talk) 00:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Indeed, I've removed it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * This is the part that Parker Richards of The Observer writes about this:

"The crown prince of Iran and Shah of Iran’s government in exile, the National Council of Iran, Mr. Pahlavi is a respected figure both in his home country and amongst expatriates, and hopes to reclaim the throne of Iran after overthrowing the current government."

Since the source is reliable and the content is verifiable, I restored it with in-text attribution. Pahlevun (talk) 01:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:NPOV
Ok. This just seems NPOV and seriously favoring Iran (the country). I mean, read this: "The "self-styled"[6] National Council claims to have gathered "tens of thousands of pro-democracy proponents from both inside and outside Iran."[4] It also claims to represent religious and ethnic minorities.[7] According to Kenneth Katzman, the group which was established with over 30 groups has '"suffered defections and its activity level appears minimal".[3]" Italics = what I percieve to be NPOV. I could be completely wrong, but this stands out to me. Maybe it's just a stub of which the only available information is "negative"? I don't know. What do you all think? Thanks. KinneticSlammer (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)