Talk:National Cycle Network

NCR10
I've just seen signs have gone up in Chew Stoke detailing it as part of NCR 10 - but wikipedia doesn't appear to have an entry for this route. Does anyone have further details?&mdash; Rod talk 18:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * this map seems to show it as regional route 10 (Avon Cycleway). i believe these are separate to the national cycle network, but probably still deserve their own articles if they don't have them... Cmiag 20:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Graphical Overview
This is a huge job, but....

I'm finding it quite tricky to get usable route-planning info for the routes, there is no decent atlas of maps that I can find, and the routes are mapped in a seemingly endless set of leaflets. The large scale overview of the UK that sustrans produces isn't good for actually finding your way. When doing a long-distance route, one can easily cover several ordnance survey maps, most of the maps are not needed... a book of strip maps would be ideal.

It seems that these set of pages are the place to build such a thing - unfortunately I don't have the knowledge on the topic to do it! What I'd like to see is a graphical overview of the network, the country divided into regions, each with a map - and from there one can link to individual routes with more detailed information. A big list of routes is a necessary evil, but it's not great for getting a sense of where the network goes.

Is there a way to link these articles to, say, open streetmap data?

Murkee (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Errors
I added a new section to the article after noticing Prestwich was incorrectly labelled as Prestwick on the map found on the Sustrans website. The map is linked at the bottom of the article, I'm not sure if the line I wrote about Prestwich should somehow link to the map or point down to the external links part of the article. I'm new to Wiki editing though so not sure how to do that anyway.

Is anyone aware of other errors on the map or other related parts of the network/literature that could be listed here?

Jack of Many (talk) 12:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, Biggleswade between Sandy and Stevenage is marked as Bigglesworth. I mean: c'mon, Sustrans. Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Kevin, I'm curious as to why you removed the Errors section as "non-encyclopedic". I had a good read of the editing guidelines before posting that section and again after you removed it and I can't see why it shouldn't be included. Can you clarify? Jack of Many (talk) 16:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I think you'll find that said section falls under trivia. I'm interested as to how you think it's relevant or encyclopaedic. Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 19:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the relevance is obvious, in an article about the NCN a mention of errors on the official map is certainly relevant. The issue then, is whether or not such information should be included. On that issue I have a few comments.
 * It certainly doesn't detract from the article to have such an inclusion.
 * The information is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * Considering the existance of "list" articles on Wikipedia, some of which are nothing but trivia for example I'm not sure trivia is necessarily objectionable on Wikipedia.
 * While I agree that such information wouldn't be published in a print encyclopedia, we don't have the same space constraints here. Taking a lead from the article editing guidelines, and also from the example of other articles, I felt mentioning the errors on the Sustrans NCN map was fitting. I'll be interested to hear what you make of these points.
 * As a reference, I've been reading these articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Trivia_sections and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Handling_trivia - I still feel the information in that "Errors" section is suitable for inclusion, even if only as a temporary measure before it can be presented in a more suitable manner, whether that manner would be prose or a better presented list I don't know, but either would work. Jack of Many (talk) 11:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Well; it's anyone's article, so you can stick it back in if you want to wish to. Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 14:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I think I'll hold off doing it for now, I do think the information should go in somehow, but I don't know if a list is the best way to do it. I'll come back to it though. Jack of Many (talk) 14:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Route 31 - Suffolk
Hi - a query more than anything that I figure someone here might know the answer to :-)

I keep on driving past cycle route signs numbered as Route 31 - which may ne a national route I'm not sure - going south from Beccles and through places such as Sotterley. I'm not sure entirely where it starts or ends and can find absolutely no reference to it at all on t'web. Anyone know anything at all about this or is it just SCC putting up random signs? Cheers. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * It is NCN Regional Route 31 - Beccles to Reedham. http://www.sustrans.org.uk/map 188.223.5.83 (talk) 15:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

National Cycle Network (NCN).

The pages dedicated to the individual national routes of the NCN are incorrectly titled. For example, the page dedicated to national route 8 on the National Cycle Network is titled 'National Cycle Route 8', and in the first line of text we read National Cycle Route 8 (or NCR8).
 * The title should read 'National Cyce Network, national route 8 (or NCN8). This would follow the convention used on the SUSTRANS website http://www.sustrans.org.uk/ncn/map/national-cycle-network the organisation which administers the National Cycle Network, and makes no reference to National Cycle Route or the abreviation NCR.


 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Big Audle (talk • contribs) 20:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Cycle Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120827003903/http://www.essexhighways.org/Cycling/National-Cycle-Network.aspx to http://www.essexhighways.org/Cycling/National-Cycle-Network.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121104234217/http://www.bikenet.com/articles/the-uk-on-a-bicycle-the-national-cycle-network.html to http://www.bikenet.com/articles/the-uk-on-a-bicycle-the-national-cycle-network.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Incorrect titles for individual route pages
As noted previously, the individual route pages are titled incorrectly & described incorrectly in those pages: 'National Cycle Route 5 (or NCR 5)'. I've never seen a Sustrans document or sign which names them as such. It should be 'National Cycle Network Route 5 (NCN 5)' as per Sustran's website & publications.

Amending the contents of the pages is easy enough, but how can they be renamed? I assume all the links to those pages would require updating, also. Is there an official 'bot' which can perform this function? --Dave F63 (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You can request pages are renamed at WP:RM, I would guess that you could do a multiple request rather than individual ones for each page. Keith D (talk) 23:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)