Talk:National Federation of Women Workers/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Goldsztajn (talk · contribs) 20:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

I might take up to seven days to complete the review depending on content; parking the empty table below for the review. Goldsztajn (talk · contribs) 20:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Review now completed, I think the comments I have posed can be relatively easily addressed and if so, the article can reach GA.--Goldsztajn (talk) 15:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Update Since Review
1B - Lead has been reviewed summarising significance of organization and factual corrections as highlighted - MOS Lead - Layout has been changed to reflect comments in review on MOS layout - It copy editing undertaken as per review on MOS words to watch

2A - Blog sites removed and replaced with better sources. A number of new sources have been added on back of suggestions in talk page to replace these and improve other areas of article. New content from sources has also been added.

2B - Reference to Times newspaper removed. Pathe film sentence reviewed to make clarity better as per review suggestion.

3A - All four comments in reveiw acted upon including the addition of new material on 1908 strike and amalgamation.

3B - Removed irrelevant section and removed the section on the badge with inclusion of caption instead. New main image added to infobox.

Franko2nd (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! thanks for the quick response. Give me 24 hours to respond please. Regards --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! I've added comments in response to your changes in the review above. I've also done some copy editing to the article where I can. If you can address these points I think we will be very close.--Goldsztajn (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * A small piece of advice with citations: with this edit I removed the double linking to the OCLC, where possible the URL link should point to the actual text, not a catalogue reference.--Goldsztajn (talk) 10:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Status query
Goldsztajn, Franko2nd, where does this nomination stand? It's been about eight weeks since the last post to this page, and over a month since Franko2nd's most recent edits to the article. It would be great to get this moving again. Thanks to you both. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * From what I can see has made some changes, but there are still outstanding issues. If we don't hear anything by the end of Sunday 5 April, I'll close as not passing. Thanks for doing the follow up, regards--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Closing
unfortunately, I will have to close this as incomplete. It's an article worthy of being a good article. If I find time I will try to do some more work so it can be renominated and reviewed by someone else. --Goldsztajn (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)