Talk:National Front of Catalonia (2013)

Notability
Today this page was deleted in the Italian Wikipedia because of lack of encyclopedic notability. The discussion was here: it:Wikipedia:Pagine da cancellare/Front Nacional de Catalunya (2013) --FogueraC (talk) 13:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I am a liberal democrat but I think its necesary to add this page so that people can find information --Sylas (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Today this page was deleted in the Spanish Wikipedia because of lack of encyclopedic notability. The article was here: Frente Nacional de Cataluña (2013) --FogueraC (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hi, We already explained it to you in Catalan Wikipedia, but as you ask me to repeat it, I explain it here. Wikipedia has a guideline about conflicts of interests. The nutshell is «Do not edit Wikipedia in your own interests, nor in the interests of your external relationships». In particular, do not edit Wikipedia in interests of your party. As you explained to us in Catalan Wikipedia, you are part of the FNC, so you can not edit this page, even if you try to delete it. So please, stop reverting me and. And you don't need to try again to put all this spam links as a anonymous user, because it also violates the External links guideline.--FogueraC (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

there is no such conflict of interest on publishing a fact, the official website as any other political party has. I would appreciate if you do not manipulate the Wikipedia. The conflic of interest is observed in your side as your user has been clearly created to block facts around the Front Nacional de Catalunya, based on your contributions: (contribs). And by not allowing any other user to contribute. Wikipages are not owned by one or two users. Please. Tinshome

The information you have deleted for second time is a fact, correct and valid. Please stop deleting correct information from Wikipedia. Please allow people to contribute with real information. Wikipedia is not the property of two users, that are systematically providing biased information. I have observed that your contributions (contribs) are focused on systematically removing content from Article although the continuous complains of multiple people. To the point you are disturbed to have the oficial website published. Tinshome (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The official webpage is acceptable. Thanks for stopping to add the other spam links. However, you should not make personal attacks, they also go against the guidelines. --FogueraC (talk) 23:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It is not nice to change the comments once they have been answered, as you did. Please stop.--FogueraC (talk) 08:40, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

First, just for clarification I did not add any spam link. Second, I only realized you already responded when I saved my change. I moved to the right section, not deleted. Not intentional or bad faith. You were really fast in answering. :-) Tinshome (talk) 02:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)