Talk:National Institute on Media and the Family

Untitled
It's just a POV ad! 193.140.197.56 12:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

National Institute on Media and the Family Facts
First, this organization is not affiliated with any religious group. Second they do not condone any type of censorship. Basically they are trying to educate parents on some of the benefits and pitfalls of media and how it impacts children. Yes there are many other organizations that do not care for the Institute, but the fact is this is a helpful organizations. Thoughts? —Jgisler596 (talk) 03:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nowhere in the article does it sate that the organization is affiliated with any religious group or that it actively censors content from media providers. The NIMF is correctly assessed as a nonsectarian advocacy group. It may or may not be a helpful organization - this does not matter, the article must be written from a neutral point of view. Your edits replace referenced and neutral prose with what basically amounts to be an advertisement for the group. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * There's still considerable work left to do in polishing this article and including information on the group's activities. I'll try to flesh it out a bit. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Institute on Media and the Family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070116170309/http://www.mediafamily.org/research/vgrc_index.shtml to http://www.mediafamily.org/research/vgrc_index.shtml
 * Added tag to http://www.pta.org/ne_press_release_detail_1133460190390.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)