Talk:National Press Monument

Title
Saying National Press Monument in the title would not automatically evoke a museum in Indonesia. I suggest moving it to National Press Monument (Indonesia) for better clarification. There might be other national press monuments elsewhere. Bennylin (talk) 06:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Unless there is another National Press Monument, I think that would be redundant. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Revert
Was the revert necessary or are you owning the article now? Could a third party take a look at the diffs? Bennylin (talk) 11:00, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Since I haven't finished adding citations when the revert occurs, I would ask permission nuwun sewu, to continue where I left off. Bennylin (talk) 11:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Erm, no. You are WP:overlinking (museum? really? that's such a common word that the value of that link is next to nothing), adding data into the infobox which makes it overly cramped (wp:disinfobox), and adding information which is not relevant, not cited, or both (the "pen" in front of the monument, for instance, or the name of the kenthongan). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, you did not follow the existing citation style (SFN), added refs into the lede despite the MOS explicitly saying it is not necessary (see WP:LEDE), and linking to categories in articles (that is disingenous, as an article on the Press in Indonesia is well overdue, and blocking the redlink makes it less likely to be created). The "See alsos" are irrelevant (Radya Pustaka Museum is unrelated to press; simply being in the same city is not enough) or could possibly be linked in the body of the article. The addition of "library" to the first sentence is misleading, as the main purpose of the monument is not as a library; most schools have libraries, but we would not say that the school is a library. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * As for your claim of "ownership", read WP:BRD: a single revert of controversial edits is certainly valid, and discussion (as is going on here) is the desired outcome. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

File:National Press Monument, Solo (panorama) Diliff.jpg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:National Press Monument, Solo (panorama) Diliff.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 26, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-05-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)