Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Fall River, Massachusetts

Sites that no longer exist
I think any site that no longer exists should not be kept in the main list. The properties are either demolished or were destroyed by fire. They should be put into the "other" status to raise awareness that they need to be delisted. --Marcbela (talk) 13:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, they should be added to WP:NRIS issues, but they should be kept with the others as long as they're listed. The primary list is for all sites that are currently listed; the secondary is failed listings and delistings.  Nyttend (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I will have them delisted then, as it should be.--Marcbela (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You will have them delisted? You can try, and I encourage you so to do, but I think delisting is the responsibility of someone else.  Nyttend (talk) 14:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I am involved with the local Preservation Society. One of our current goals is to update the current list in the city, and review possible new candidates. I understand that everything goes through Boston first (Mass Historical). --Marcbela (talk) 14:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, the Keeper of the Register is in Washington, DC. Nyttend (talk) 14:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

But all listings (or delistings) are handled through the state historic preservation office (SHPO) of each state.--Marcbela (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I misunderstood you before. Thanks!  Nyttend (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)