Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Michigan

Huh?
Is this supposed to be Detroit?
 * Detriot
 * Nellie Leland School

Also what is the source for this list? Rmhermen 00:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * About "Nellie Leland School", I have no idea. As for the source, I can't say for sure, but I think it was from the National Park Service National Register of Historic Places. It is replete with egregious misspellings, many of which were reproduced in this list. older&ne;wiser 01:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

any NRHPs spanning 2 counties?
The current total of NRHPs stated is 1,686, but perhaps that is not correct if more than one individual county tally includes the same historic district or bridge or other NRHP. Are there any such cases? If so, they should be listed in both counties, and a duplicates subtraction should be added to the summary tally table here. doncram (talk) 19:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I put all the county lists into Excel at the same time (removing formatting to ensure that they all sorted equally); there ewre only a few duplicate names, and those were all things like "First Presbyterian Church" that are obviously different sites with the same location—with one exception, the West Jefferson Avenue-Rouge River Bridge. This is only in Wayne County, but it is listed twice because it's split between Detroit and River Rouge.  Nyttend (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hence: no duplicates. Nyttend (talk) 01:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No duplicates except for the one you point out? :) Note, i added a duplicates subtraction row for one historic site that spans two districts of Portland, Oregon, in the tally table at List of RHPs in OR. Is that needed, or is a footnote needed (like to the Wayne non-Detroit total explaining it doesn't include that one)?  Thanks, already, for verifying there are no others to address. doncram (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You were asking about multicounty sites: there are none. I think the footnote would be reasonable: it saves space and is probably less confusing.  Nyttend (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, u move like a ninja! I see the footnote you added to the total for the county, that is fine.  Thanks! doncram (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Like a ninja? Not like the ones at http://www.realultimatepower.net/index4.htm, at least :-)  Nyttend (talk) 01:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Found one more duplicate: Clinton-Kalamazoo Canal in Macomb and Oakland. Does this reduce the total count? (I'm not sure, so I didn't change). Andrew Jameson (talk) 11:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I updated the grand total, subtracting one to 1,722 now, altho i didn't actually add them all up to check. I think Sanfranman59 and helpers who update these keep the tally very accurately, and this new piece of info about duplication is an update that should change the grand total.  Cheers. --doncram (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Register of Historic Places listings in Michigan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DdAiEffK?url=http://www.ironmountaindailynews.com/page/content.detail/id/534704.html to http://www.ironmountaindailynews.com/page/content.detail/id/534704.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425153824/http://cluster.biodiversitylibrary.org/i/indiansiteschipp3612binf/indiansiteschipp3612binf.pdf to http://cluster.biodiversitylibrary.org/i/indiansiteschipp3612binf/indiansiteschipp3612binf.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

†
What is the purpose of the daggers (†) after the names of the 3 districts in Iosco County? Anyone object if they are removed? &mdash; Ipoellet (talk) 23:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)