Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Providence, Rhode Island

Image copyright problem with Image:Moses Brown Aerial-.jpg
The image Image:Moses Brown Aerial-.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --22:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Photos needed
May not be complete or accurate

Current listings

 * }

Louttit Laundry
I restored this to the main list, with a cite needed tag. Even if the building has been demolished, it may still be listed on the NRHP. Odd, but true, as I've encountered a number like it in my NRHP roadtrips around Florida. -- ‖ Ebyabe  talk -   Health and Welfare   ‖ 18:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

"Former" listings
Properties should only be moved to the "Former listings" if they have been formally removed from the National Register. Demolished properties (such as the Louttit Laundry, mentioned above), are still listed on the National Register. (See e.g. the state-maintained list of listings, where that and other demolished properties continue to appear.)  Magic ♪piano 14:35, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Register of Historic Places listings in Providence, Rhode Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140625212255/http://ppsri.org/ten-most-endangered-properties/1995-mep-list to http://www.ppsri.org/ten-most-endangered-properties/1995-mep-list
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140625212255/http://ppsri.org/ten-most-endangered-properties/1995-mep-list to http://www.ppsri.org/ten-most-endangered-properties/1995-mep-list

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Image quality
Hi! has replaced a number of images that have been in this article for a while now. Do any of you have thoughts on which photos should be used? I am concerned that those by (the first two) are largely out of focus, aren't corrected for perspective distortion, and may not follow the guidelines established in MOS:IMAGEQUALITY. I'd love to hear someone else's thoughts. Filetime (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Without a doubt, all of the images on the left are better. The bottom left has even been assessed as a Quality Image. Pbrks (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Artistry is not the only criterion for Wikipedia; even if the left images have more technical benefits, the images on the right are more suitable given they show more (set 3), or more prominent facades (set 2), or with better lighting (set 1). ɱ  (talk) 03:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)