Talk:National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope

POV
In the process of adding back AAAS's objections to the report, I noticed that the "Reception and critique" section contains only unfavorable reactions, so I added a POV tag. I am sure the usual politicians and commentators applauded the report. Are those reactions relevant here, or should this section include only reactions from credible scientists and academics? Peter Chastain (talk) 13:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure about the usual politicians, but usual commentators would belong here, if they are reliable. But please, we need to see that they existed, otherwise this POV tag should go away. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 04:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ContentRecord_id=8a114193-dcf7-4ae8-ae8b-146797e5c162

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327030114/http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=310ACFE5-299E-4EDF-8815-E9CAC290C0E3 to http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=310ACFE5-299E-4EDF-8815-E9CAC290C0E3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110903163425/http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/05/senators-criticism-of-science.html to http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/05/senators-criticism-of-science.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110814052652/http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/06/social-sciences-face-uphill-battle.html to http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/06/social-sciences-face-uphill-battle.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110906051101/http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2011/05/coburns_nsf_idiocy.php to http://scienceblogs.com/mikethemadbiologist/2011/05/coburns_nsf_idiocy.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)