Talk:National identity cards in China

Please have a look at WP:EW. Your habit of reverting people without giving any explanation, when you already know your edits are disputed (see, , ), is generally considered edit-warring behavior. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And here you've done it again. Do you not read?
 * Here is the issue. Pinyin, simplified characters, and traditional characters are just different names for the same thing, and yet you are listing them on separate lines as if they are different things. On that same page you are not listing Macau's "Macau Special Administrative Region Resident Identity Card" and "Bilhete de Identidade de Residente" on different lines, so why are you doing it for this one? r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Still it's nice to see all isn't it? Only so one can compare. And the one who started EW is YOU. I just created the article and am working on it. Nice if you help. But go away if you look for trouble. TruckCard (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If you don't want to list both simplified and traditional character names for a card, then don't; you haven't done it for the other cards (except for Macau; I don't see why you insist on treating that one differently than the others). But, for reasons I explained above, listing the PRC card across three lines is just wrong. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Regarding this: a page listing links to multiple related articles that a person might be searching for is a dab page. Don't try to act like it's not; it's clear that you're just mad that your move was contested and now you're trying to create your own article at that title. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

It's not a dab page, it gives an overview. TruckCard (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)