Talk:National revival

CSD Nom
I'm tempted to decline this. The nomination criteria: "This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as an article that contains no content whatsoever, or consists only of external links, category tags, a "see also" section, a rephrasing of the title, an attempt to correspond with the person or group named by its title, chat-like comments and/or images." It -has- content. Minimal content, but it has content. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  18:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

10 words and a a dozen of links and that makes it a stub? Let's take this to the AfD discussion anyway. --JokerXtreme (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, agree. To be honest, as-is this article isn't doing anything, and I just submitted a neutral stance to the AfD because I could really go either way. But the 10 words at issue do push this past an A3, in my opinion. The article would literally need to be empty of anything but "See Also's," in this case, to be an A3 candidate. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  19:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)