Talk:National symbols of Bhutan/GA1

GA Review
GAN withdrawn to allow further development of the article. Comments from original GAN talk page are retained below.

Comments
Thank you for nominating this page in the interest of expanding the coverage of Bhutan on Wikipedia. As a reviewer, I'm here to help ensure this article is the best it can be. With a quick Google search I came up with this link, which provides many more symbols of Bhutan than are listed here. I'd like to see this article expanded significantly and more thoroughly researched. Do you think you have the time to invest in doing that over the next couple of weeks? If so, I'll put the article on hold. If not, you could withdraw the nomination and I'll be happy to come back to it after it's been expanded. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 19:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This article was modeled after current GA article National symbols of Belarus. Spongie555 (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've contributed significantly to what's currently here, but I don't have much more time to invest in further editing it over the next couple of weeks. I'll keep at it when I can, though. Two comments: this link shows the same additional information as above but is published by the government (MoHCA, Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications) rather than an unsourced travel agency; and I think it's safe to say there've been no edit wars per the description in the GA criteria. Just copy editing and changes based on reviewers' suggestions so far, which have been helpful. Cheers. JFHJr (㊟) 21:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I will try to expand the article this weekend if I can. Spongie555 (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually i will be busy this weekend so you can withdraw it. Spongie555 (talk) 04:37, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added more information from the external link above and other sources. And images! Some material has also been corrected. Does this look closer to complete? JFHJr (㊟) 17:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it's much closer to complete, but the lead is still a bit on the short side given the length of the article. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2011 (UTC)