Talk:National without household registration/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 20:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

''In progress. Sammi Brie (t • c) 20:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)''


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Many citations to relevant laws in this section.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The pruning of this article has resulted in a honed article with a very tightly defined scope and which imparts detail while being accessible to readers—like this one—not familiar with the topic.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Very well done in terms of maintaining NPOV and neutral terminology in an article that in several places mentions the ROC and PRC together.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Horserice has been the predominant contributor in the last year and few other changes have been made in recent months.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Two public domain photos. The mention of labeling in the caption for the ID card no longer relates to the image because a 2019 revision removed the annotations.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The caption on the first photo needs to be altered before this nomination is passed.
 * The caption on the first photo needs to be altered before this nomination is passed.


 * This article has been reviewed and it looks great. It's clearly benefited from being trimmed back and having a tightly defined scope. The main stumbling block is one you might not have noticed. In 2019, the identification card image was changed to a new revision that removed the annotations, which are referenced in the caption. I'm putting this on hold for 7 days to allow this to be fixed or replaced with an appropriate new image. Sammi Brie (t • c) 20:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing! I changed the image caption to no longer reference old image annotations. Horserice (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The new caption resolves the pending concern. This is a great example of how less can sometimes be more in an article and slimming it down can result in a better product. I will be passing this article. Sammi Brie (t • c) 22:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)