Talk:Nationalmuseum robbery

Images and titles
Am I right in thinking that the three paintings referred to in this article, which were the stolen in this robbery and later returned, and which are currently held by the Nationalmuseum in Stockholm, are the following.

Looking at some of the online sources in the article already, the two CNN sources from 2001 says "Renoir's "Conversation" -- a close-up of a man and a woman with her back turned to the viewer"; the LA Times in 2005 refers to "Renoir’s “Conversation.”"; and the ABC source from 2006 also says "a self-portrait by the Dutch master Rembrandt and two works by the French impressionist Pierre-Auguste Renoir — A Young Parisian Woman and Conversation."

How reliable is "crimemuseum.org", given they say that the stolen work was Conversation with Gardner (as admittedly do some other sources, but mistakenly I think) and also appear to be showing a Renoir painting held by the National Gallery of Art in Washington DC and not as far as I know ever stolen? I would suggest that anything sourced from there should be treated with an exceptionally large pinch of salt. Theramin (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You are right that it would be those three paintings (Conversation, Self Portrait, and Young Parisian.) I did not notice the error in crime museum and I will remove it. Thank you for pointing this out! Also I think a visual of the paintings would be appropriate, I'll put them in. Thanks! Flalf Talk 04:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)