Talk:Natural History Museum of the University of Pisa/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 18:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

The article, unfortunately, currently meets the quick-fail criteria as much of the content is not verifiable to reliable sources. Also, comparing with the Italian version of the article brings doubts as to whether the article really fulfills the broadness criterion as well. I suggest continuing to work on the article and especially making sure that all content is cited to reliable sources before re-nominating. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  18:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review. I will look up the broadness criteria too. Appreciate the quick feedback and understand the lack of reliable sources. Just was happy with my complete rewrite of the old page that was a mess.--Akrasia25 (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Since there are still many parts of the article without sources, I am going to close the review as unsuccessful. Please continue to work on the article and bring it back to GAN in the future! (t &#183; c)  buidhe  11:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)