Talk:Naturalistic spirituality

This article should be merged with religious naturalism

No it should be changed to spiritual naturalism or better yet merged with pantheism as that's what it is. Most Religious naturalisms do not use the term pantheism but do consider pantheists as one of them.65.26.156.212 (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

I have redirected this article to spiritual naturalism which is far more common. This article had no references and appears to be the viewpoint of only one person - that has been expanded considerably. The rational for doing this is given in the first paragraph of the redirect and the reason to keep it separate from religious naturalism later in the article. I have been worked in this paradigm area for 5 years and think I have a good feel for what is needed to clearify it. I think I have put this subject on respectable ground with the references that were needed in the first place.Jlrobertson (talk) 13:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)