Talk:Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ian F Whitman, Ikhan-rollins. Peer reviewers: Imartins34, Lkhk32, Zxmaria, Starlyia, Brandon Shortrede.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed merge of The Art of Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind into Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (film)
The artbook is definitely toeing the line with regards to notability, and it seems like it would be permastub material either way. I think the content of the artbook article could easily find a home in a subsection of the film article, or possibly the article on the manga. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Lacking any comment in this discussion for almost a month, I'm going to go ahead and perform the merge. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

About the reverts
Hey Chorake, thanks for your contributions to this article! Please make sure you understand the policy on self-published sources. Information from these kinds of sources are generally not reliable, and not eligible for citation on Wikipedia. I'd recommend that you read through the links in this message and the ones above, which will help you determine which sources are reliable. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I think three separate sources are fine to confirm what information is already present in the credits for the film proper. Chorake (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not commenting on the number of sources but on their quality. Also, I'm going through your edit in more detail now, and I'm not sure the information you're adding needs to be in the article per WP:WEIGHT, which requires that balance be maintained in articles by including information included in reliable sources. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I think it's only fair that the people involved in the post-production should be acknowledged by name if the same amount of detail is to be extended to those involved with the second. Chorake (talk) 02:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Totally fine if you want to include that! I'm only saying that your additions need to be supported by sources that are secondary, independent, and reputably published, as described at WP:RS. Wikipedia isn't a reflection of editors' opinions, but a representation of information provided in reliable sources. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * All well and good. I don't want any misunderstanding between us, but as I'm sure you're aware for these kind of pedantic topics, it does take a little extra digging for reputable sources. Thank you for your patience. Chorake (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Chorake: Thanks for doing that; the Almanac and American copyright database sources appear to support your edits. I've removed the unreliable database which you reinstated, but I don't think that matters anymore since all of the information is already sourced. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Ohmu
in the lore section, Ohmu has been misspelled to Ohm. Could someone change this? I'm not sure how to :-(

Regards, Tom2st (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

About the unreliable sources tag
Dani Cavallaro's publications have been designated as generally unreliable sources in this discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard. Citations to her work can be replaced with more high-quality ones or removed, and the tag can be taken off once complete. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 20:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)