Talk:Nautilus-class minelayer/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 16:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

: With a few minor grammatical tweaks made, the article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article cites several reputable publications; no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article sufficiently covers all relevant aspects of its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 17:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article maintains an unbiased approach to its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 17:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC) . The article has not been subjected to edit-warring or similar disruptions for at least five years, based on an initial view of the revision history. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 16:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC) : All images used in the article are freely licensed, so do not violate copyright in any way. All are relevant to the article, and are appropriately captioned. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 16:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

The article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)