Talk:Nautilus Minerals

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nautilus Minerals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100812102807/http://www.nautilusminerals.com/s/Projects-Solwara.asp to http://www.nautilusminerals.com/s/Projects-Solwara.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100705094134/http://www.nautilusminerals.com/i/pdf/2008-02-01_Solwara1_43-101.pdf to http://www.nautilusminerals.com/i/pdf/2008-02-01_Solwara1_43-101.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100705094134/http://www.nautilusminerals.com/i/pdf/2008-02-01_Solwara1_43-101.pdf to http://www.nautilusminerals.com/i/pdf/2008-02-01_Solwara1_43-101.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

WP:BUZZ
I'm not very familiar with Wikipedia guidelines, but some of this seems to violate WP:BUZZ to me.

e.g. I would think "It will be the world's first deep-sea mining project" would be phrased more neutrally as "It may be ..."

The article also repeats the phrase "world's first" an awful lot

Ackhuman (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
— Assignment last updated by ChloejWard (talk) 03:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

MERGER PROPOSAL
I propose merging my article User:Naeim9146/Nautilus_Minerals into this one. I think I have written a well balanced and well researched article - I would like your review on it if its possible — Preceding undated comment added 15:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * That looks reasonable to me. Your draft is high-quality and cited to decent sources. Make sure all sentences/passages are cited, though, I see a few still uncited including the final sentence. Generally, it would be an improvement over the current version. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)