Talk:Navarre, Florida

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Navarre, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071030130941/http://www.santarosa.fl.gov/zoning/ntcp/ntcpfinalapprovedplan/introduction.pdf to http://www.santarosa.fl.gov/zoning/ntcp/ntcpfinalapprovedplan/introduction.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060410175017/http://www.navarrefl.com:80/location1.html to http://www.navarrefl.com/location1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Touchy-feely history, part two....
...the story about Col Wyman and his French bride is a little less chamber-of-commerce friendly; he apparently divorced her, and fatally shot her soon thereafter when she was tending a pet's grave at her old house. Anmccaff (talk) 22:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * -There were no official records or citations found that confirmed this, so it was struck from the article as a whole--Navarre0107 (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Merger proposal (Navarre Beach)

 * As an exploratory measure, what would y'all's opinions be if the Navarre Beach were merged into the mainland Navarre page? Remember to write according to Merging--Navarre0107 (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge, I would say merge, due to the fact that almost all of the information on this page is covered on the mainland Navarre page, as well as the fact that these really aren't separate communities, and are considered by the local population, to be the same town.--Navarre0107 (talk) 13:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge, I would say yes, Navarre Beach is largely considered to be part of Navarre anyways, so if it was kept as its own page, it should be made clear that its a neighborhood of Navarre, and not its own separate community. --RainbowIsBestPony (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Why is this being nominated for Good Article status while the merge is still ongoing? There is enough consensus here to complete the merge. I would suggest doing the merge now or removing the nomination. This currently fails the stability criteria as a merge could result in a major change to the article. AIRcorn (talk) 21:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Recommended Changes to History Section
The discussions about the protests don't appear to be appropriate for the History section. They would seem to be more relevant under a Law and Government section, with a paragraph on Politics. Also, the "protests" about the Navarre sign and the HNWS were mostly objections discussed on social media. There were never any physical protest activities in the community. Florida's Most Relaxing Place would never get so upset about topics like those. :) --SkyJumper1 (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Actually, there were physical protests, images of which should be located in the several citations given for each event. Also there is no Law and Government section at this time, if you want, you can create one and we could move the protest paragraph there, otherwise, I think that this is best placed in the history section. -- Navarre0107 (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Merger Proposal (Holley, Florida)
I believe that it would be best suited for the Holley, Florida page to merge into this page. Holley is part of Navarre's Census Designated Area (edit: it appears as though I misquoted the Census term, Holley is part of Navarre's Census County Division, not Census Designated Area), Holley is part of Navarre's County Commission district, and for all intents and purposes, as it already says on the Holley, Florida page, Holley is largely seen as simply a part of Navarre already. --Navarre0107 (talk) 22:31, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Merge: On top of what I have previously mentioned, Holley's page is quite small and there is a lot of overlap; Holley's page could possibly be better served as part of Navarre's article in the long run. --Navarre0107 (talk) 22:31, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Oppose The Census Bureau considers Holley and Navarre to be two distinct (though adjacent) census-designated places. I'm not sure what you mean by Holley being part of Navarre's census designated area; according to official Census maps, the two are adjacent but have separate borders. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * -- My apologies, it appears as though I mixed up my census terms, looking at it, it appears as though the term is Census County Division, not Census Designated Area, but the idea is still the same, here's the definitive 2010 U.S. Census Report for Florida, on PDF page 64 (report page 30), under Santa Rosa County, it breaks down Navarre and Holley as the "Holley-Navarre CCD," an abbreviation for the Holley-Navarre Census County Division. However, even disregarding this, as Census borders have little to no legal recognition, Holley is still locally seen as part of the larger community of Navarre -- Navarre0107 (talk) 04:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Reverts
An editor reverted the deletion of non-notable persons from this article, here. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre,_Florida&diff=1068191937&oldid=1068154766

Also here .. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Navarre,_Florida&diff=1068192308&oldid=1068191937

Not only were the reverts/edits improper, the editor in addition failed to provide the required explanatory edit summary, making no effort to justify the revert.

It also caught my attention that the user name of the person making these changes is that (with slight addition) of the name of the article itself. And that the editor insists on adding patently non-notable persons to the "notable persons" list. While we assume good faith, the possibility of a sense of the editor that she/he owns the article does admittedly come to mind. As well as possible conflict of interest.

I would ask the editor to either self-revert, or alternatively provide a proper rationale for their action and inaction.

User:SounderBruce -- perhaps you have some thoughts on this, as I see you have looked closely at earlier forms of this article.

--2603:7000:2143:8500:9B8:B23B:7DDC:518E (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)