Talk:NaviSite

Criticisms and incidents
Under Neutral point of view, we are entitled (and obliged) to document criticisms of companies as well as praise. This article includes "Awards and Recognitions", so why should it not also include "Criticisms and incidents"? I had added a section including recent criticism from Jagex, with sources cited for verification. Someone had removed this, essentially saying that because the original posts on Jagex's website are no longer under available under their original URL, the criticism should not appear here. I think this is a shoddy reason to remove relevant criticism (since Jagex obviously felt strongly enough about this to publish it on their homepage), especially as archived forms of their original posts are cited as proof that they made the comments quoted. As such, I have restored the section in question, but in case anyone would like to argue that recent and well sourced criticism should not be in this article, please raise the issue here. Many thanks. :-) leevclarke (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NaviSite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111217222157/http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/020211-timewarner-navisite-cloud.html to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/020211-timewarner-navisite-cloud.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Redirect
The company has been discussed ten years ago at Articles for deletion/NaviSite Inc.. At that time four reliable sources were presented, but at least two of those four do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. As was the case ten years ago, press releases abound, but significant coverage in reliable third-party sources is in short supply. That holds both for the article and my searches to find additional sources. There's no indication that the company is notable, and of course there's also the spam issue that the page has been tagged for since February 2019. Thus I'll redirect the article to the parent company Charter Communications. Huon (talk) 19:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)