Talk:Navigation/to do

Informal assessment prepatory to GA-run:


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Describe acoustic navigation technologies such as sonar
 * Flesh out Integrated Bridge Systems. ECDIS seems like a good place to start.
 * Celestial section needs citations
 * Description of circle of equal altitude might be useful
 * Brief description of other observations: az/amp/mp/lan/
 * The marine sextant section is too heavy on anatomy and too light on 1) what it actually is used for, and 2) how it works. There should be some good info in Bowditch...
 * Radio navigation and satellite navigation focus more on history than the actual subject matter.
 * Cobble together a summary of History of navigation and add it back as a section
 * After stabilizing content:
 * Develop stubby paragraphs per 1a
 * Could use a number of copyedits
 * Rework lead to mirror the new article's table of contents

H aus  Talk  12:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)