Talk:Navin Raheja

Must be neutral
I'm doing a big cleanup of the article because ultimately the article was incredibly promotional and is being used as a sandbox for and against Raheja. All articles must be written in a neutral and encyclopedic manner and if something has gained enough coverage (ie, allegations of a scam) then that must be covered in the article in some form or fashion. It is incredibly inappropriate to try to use this as a way to promote either the allegations or Raheja himself, which is why I've decimated a large portion of the article. I'll work on the awards next and if we don't have reliable, non-primary sources to back the awards up then I'm going to remove them. Something to keep in mind is that not all awards are considered to be notable per Wikipedia's guidelines and we typically only include the ones that have received coverage or some sort of mention in reliable sources like newspapers and the like. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   13:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * As things stand, the article should be redirected to that for the company. There is nothing but a minor award and a trivial appointment here. Notability is not inherited. (I've not looked at the article for the company, so have no idea whether that meets our standards but this article certainly does not at present). - Sitush (talk) 17:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)