Talk:Nawab ud din Ramdasi

Refs
This bio has been tagged as missing refs since 2011. Rather than whole-cloth delete all the uncited material, I will from time to time review pieces of it, and if appropriate remove it as violating wp:v. Please do not restore any such deleted material unless you provide an inline citation to an RS supporting it directly. As is required by wp:burden.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear Epeefleche, with respect, this is inconsistent. Why pick and choose (subjectively) what bits of unreferenced material you want to delete? Why delete some bits and not others? If a section is unreferenced, delete it according to wp:burden. Do this for ALL such sections. Best regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 09:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * In situations like this, I often get to the whole article over time. There is not deadline.  And this give me a better chance to review what is out there for potential support in stages, and challenge that which I initially find to be appropriate for challenge.  And gives other editors a better chance to do so as well, and provide support if they like and if they can find it.  And it is less of a shock to those who might find a deletion of the near entirety of an article in one swoop to be discomfiting.  I am deleting subjectively just as all of us add material subjectively -- subjective is not a bad word here.  When you choose to write an article about person A rather than person B, you do so subjectively.  When you make a judgment that today you will write about a person's early life, and tomorrow you will write about their career, you do so subjectively.  But if in this article you wish to challenge and delete more uncited material violative of wp:v, feel free.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)