Talk:Neal Katyal

Untitled
Over reaching bush administration? Does not sound NPOV to me.24.60.124.8 20:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * That's exactly what the Supreme Court held today, that the Bush Admin overreached in hamdan, merely a statement of fact. Bona Fides 20:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC) When the admin goes beyond its legal authority, that is an overreach. Bona Fides 13:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I think that the list of his publications should be deleted, as it is a cut and paste from his CV on the Gtown website. Any thoughts?--Teutoberg 12:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that it is way too long in comparison to the rest of the narrative. Someone familiar with the literature should list the important influential articles. Bona Fides 13:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I think honors and awards should stay because they are typical of other biog stubs. Bona Fides 13:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I think the long list of honors and awards made it seem like a promotional news relase. Webster1978 (talk) 12:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Acting Solicitor General
This comment is applicable here and on the Solicitor General of the United States page. Kagan has stepped aside in her duties as Solicitor General, but still, as of today's date, the OSG official site says that Kagan is the Solicitor General. Certainly, Katyal is the acting Solicitor General, but should he be listed in the line of succession of Solicitors General, or if Kagan's nomination is not successful and she resumes the office?--Enos733 (talk) 06:16, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Work needed
The article's lede reads like a pr piece (probably because it is, judging by the number of unattributed edits) and does not mention his primary activity, megafirm partner. By contrast, the "career" section is a mess. While this netbook attempts to download windows updates, I'm going to try to equalize the disparity, but screen size may prevent that.Jweaver28 (talk) 16:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

This article only mentions two specific items under'Political Positions', both Supreme Court nominations and present him as a seeming arch conservative, strange foe a Democrat and regular contributor to MSNBC. Cuchulain9 (talk) 00:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neal Katyal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080331073129/http://www.nealkatyal.com/ to http://www.nealkatyal.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

User:184.75.117.179's deletion
Below is an IP User's deletion with an ES of just "not fair representation of position"; is this justified? "Katyal also spoke highly of President Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. In multiple tweets that were cited by Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in favor of Kavanaugh's confirmation, Katyal praised Kavanaugh's 'credentials [and] hardworking nature,' and described his 'mentoring and guidance' of female law clerks as 'a model for all of us in the legal profession.' Katyal has also described Kavanaugh as 'very gracious' and 'incredibly likable.' “It’s very hard for anyone who has worked with him, appeared before him, to frankly say a bad word about him,” Katyal observed during a July 2018 panel on Kavanaugh's nomination sponsored by The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank." X1\ (talk) 00:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

To add to article
Basic information to add to this article (in order to help make it more properly encyclopedic): where in India his father and mother came from. 98.123.38.211 (talk) 04:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)