Talk:Nearshoring/Archives/2012

Various

 * I corrected some of the language.
 * I corrected the claim that Softtek has copyrighted the term "nearshore;" in fact, the copyright is for the term "Near Shore." The term "nearshore," as an lowercase, compound word is a generic term that has been in used for many years in the context of seashore related activities and, as such, it is not a candidate for copyright protection.
 * I separated the "articles" into Articles and Nearshore-vendor Pages. The Articles list includes the material published in relatively neutral publications.  The others land directly on vendor pages with no added-value content.  The latter should really be taken out altogether, but seeing how this is my first experience at editing Wikipedia articles, I'll wait for other comments before doing so.

--Ohwiseone 05:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Contributor contact info
(if language is not a barrier) feel free to write back to me on my comment: dattaravi@hotmail.com

Removal of Providers section
If you are a provider of nearshoring services, please list yourself on a commercial search engine instead of posting a link within this article. Here are examples of links that were removed:


 * Rural Sourcing Inc. offers low-cost, high quality information technology services within the US
 * Softtek Nearshore Services - Softtek is a leading provider of Near Shore IT services to US and Europe

Links of this nature will continue to be frowned upon, unless you comment here about why your company's marketing slogan and homepage are worthy of encyclopedic mention.

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Overview

 * changes to the overview. much of the overview was devoted to why one would offshore. this is not the place since one should read offshoring for that. also, there is a consistent error in that nearshoring was called outsourcing, when it is sourcing, not just outsourcing. i did not finish making those corrections in the entire piece, but will do so later. (Excarmel 01:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC))

Introductory Definition

 * i cleaned up some lose areas. Again, there was an error in the previous version that defined nearhsoring as outsourcing, when some nearshoring is not outsourcing, but "insourcing"/ captive. Also, some vendors are adding advertisements which is inappropriate. Excarmel 20 May 2010


 * i made substantial changes to this today using our definition from the recent academic journal article on nearshoring. furthermore, there was an error in the previous version that defined nearhsoring as outsourcing, when some nearshoring is not outsourcing, but "insourcing"/ captive Excarmel (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Adminhelp request
hi there. You put a request for adminhelp here, what did you need help with? If it's regarding this proposal, then you just need to follow the procedure in WP:MOVE, ie discuss it here, and then you can do the change yourself. Give a resonable time for discussion, and consider asking the articles main contributors (from the history) to contribute their thoughts to the debate. Does that answer your query? --  Chzz  ►  21:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * This adminhelp request is closed for now; if you require further help, please place another or  on your own talk page, and please give details of what you require. You can also contact me on my own talk page. Thanks, --   Chzz  ►  04:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Rename Nearshoring to Nearshore Outsourcing - incorrect
Dear established users, I would like to propose to rename the Nearshoring article or to create separate article with the name Nearshore Outsourcing as it's more common and used term in related spheres, while Nearshoring is not. Most of professionals use Nearshore Outsourcing as derivative of Offshore Outsourcing. I contribute to one blog with the same name Nearshore Outsourcing, but the current article is not focused to serve the current needs of the industry and provide specialists from related areas with the relevant information. When interested users looking for Nearshore Outsourcing they don't use Nearshoring, according to statistics. So, if it possible, I will be very glad if you can help me to sort it out.

Thanks! (Sergeyl1984 (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC))

Sergey: This would be incorrect. One can nearshore without outsourcing. For example, when an American firm such as EDS or IBM allocates work to Monterrey Mexico it is nearshoring, but it is not outsourcing.Excarmel (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Total Rewrite
I am going to totally rewrite this article - its a disaster. Mark Dask 20:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)