Talk:Neath and Tennant Canal/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Initial comments
I've had a quick read of the article, and I believe that it should make GA-status states this time round.

I'm now working my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. This step is likely to day a day or so and this appears to be a comprehensive article. I may fix any "trivial problems" as I go through the article, and if so I might not list them here. Pyrotec (talk) 19:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

There was very litle that I needed to do: I added some convert templates (to satisfy the "metric poice") and a few wikilinks. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an informative article, which (obviously) involved a previous site visit. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)