Talk:Nebka/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Khruner (talk · contribs) 20:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I believe that the lead is somewhat not concise enough. Compare it with the brief yet splendidly informative lead of Neferhotep I also written by you.
 * I have cut down on the lead, let me know if this is still too long.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * ennemies -> enemies.
 * Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Maybe this is wrong, but when I wrote my one and only Good article, the reviewer told me that the lead, being a summary of the whole subsequent article, does not require citations which would only be a duplicate of those in the article.
 * Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * It would be nice to standardise the style of dynastic notation, since we have many "Third dynasty" together with "12th Dynasty" etc. Adopting one type over another is a matter of personal taste.
 * Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I also believe that each "Dynasty" should be capitalised.
 * Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * A further picture in the "Tomb" section would be great, if possible. Maybe something from Unfinished Northern Pyramid of Zawyet El Aryan.
 * Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

I think everything looks fine. The sources are undoubtedly reliable and well used, and the article itself seems to be exhaustive, well written, stable and neutral. Khruner (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)