Talk:Nebula Electronics

[Untitled]
This article is poorly written, is too informal and contains too much opinion. It contains odd sentences like "Nowadays, they have fallen behind the times". 81.86.99.174 (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

How can this article be considered an advertisement? This article is about a product and as such has to mention the product's features.

Agreed that it has to mention the features, however the article contains un-sourced assertions. 82.118.108.183 12:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I have proposed deletion due to Nebula Electronics being defunct, the article needing considerable improvement to style and the lack of sources. 82.118.108.183 (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I see someone has removed the proposal for deletion but not improved the article. The article needs a massive overhaul and refers to a defunct company, why not delete it> 82.118.108.183 (talk) 15:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

...and why delete something JUST FOR THE SAKE OF DELETING IT? What harm is it doing in remaining, when the information is mostly correct. I'll tidy it up when I find time. It doesn't need deleting. Plenty of other defunct companies/brands appear on Wikipedia.CX23882-19 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 12:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

The Nebula Electronics article is mostly about the DigiTV product not the defunct company which used to produce it. As it is now produced by a different company I can't see the rationale for keeping an article which is 1)About a defunct company 2)Poorly written 3)Lacking in citations/sources 4) Mostly about a product now manufactured/distributed by a different company 5)Contains original research 6) Contains innacuracies 7) Not been Wikified despite being flagged for months. DigiTV probably warrants an article with a mention of its history - original designer Nebula Electronics. 82.118.108.183 (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

This article definitely needs changing as there is far too much going on. I agree that the reference to Nebula Electronics Ltd as a history company needs to stay, but the DigiTV software should be moved to a seperate article in its own right. Above all, these articles need to be written objectively. --86.11.89.205 (talk) 18:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)