Talk:Ned Bittinger

Contesting Proposed For Deletion
When the article was first proposed for deletion, I stated in my edit summary why I contested the request. I had fixed the article to what I thought was suitable to be on the main space. I had reworded the entire article and took out adjectives that seemed to glorify the subject. Everything that is now said in the article is a fact and backed up by what I consider to be reliable sources. I have supplied a few reliable and independent sources that state everything in the article. Most of the primary sources that were used, were put in External Links to not be seen as I was promotional. If you google the subject, it is pretty clear they have had a notable enough career. I will continue to improve this article the best I can and keep providing reliable sources. Spiggotr6 (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

"backed up by what I consider to be reliable sources"
(I quote from the section above.) We consider differently. This page at fineartandyou.com is cited eleven times. This page of the same website tells me that the website is a mere PR conduit. It's so terrible that I didn't bother to check any of the other sources; however, anyone proposing to promote this to article status will need to do just that. -- Hoary (talk) 23:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I made the decision that this would go nowhere as a draft, but that Bittinger was notable. I have accepted it on that basis for the community to improve or to take whatever action they will. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ned Bittinger and Kissinger.jpg