Talk:Ned Haig

Untitled
This page was recently listed on Third opinion with the message "Ned Haig page needs a 3rd opinion.". What do you want a third opinion on? There seems to be no discussion or controversy here. Please re-list it (or reply here) with more details. --Scott Wilson 16:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The edit history shows two editors accusing each other of copy/paste violations. Proscibe a course of WP:CIVIL, WP:COPY and WP:OWN and they should feel better in the morning.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ned Haig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223212347/http://www.irb.com/history/halloffame/newsid%3D2027752.html to http://www.irb.com/history/halloffame/newsid%3D2027752.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)