Talk:Neelakasham Pachakadal Chuvanna Bhoomi

Your opinions doesnt make any sense... why are you saying only one site giving proper positive review... Please go through this sites... http://www.sify.com/movies/neelakasham-pachakkadal-chuvanna-bhoomi-review-malayalam-15036022.html http://www.madaboutmoviez.com/2013/08/neelakasham-pachakadal-chuvanna-bhoomi-triumph-confident-generation-welcoming-ecosystem/ http://english.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/contentView.do?contentType=EDITORIAL&channelId=-1073865026&programId=11565555&contentId=14737996&tabId=1&BV_ID=@@@ http://www.rediff.com/movies/review/south-review-neelakasham-pachakkadal-chuvanna-bhoomi-is-impressive/20130812.htm http://www.metromatinee.com/Review/Neelakasham%20Pacha%20Kadal%20Chuvanna%20Bhoomi%20Review-313-1 http://www.indiavisiontv.com/2013/08/11/241911.html    (In Malayalam Language) http://www.madhyamam.com/movies/node/451       (In malayalam Language)

What basis u can say only one site gave positive review... Go through the above sites reviews, please try to understang... Dont make decisions without refering these links... I'm damn sure that the film got positive reviews form most of the critics... Then about rating... Movie Tarot's Happiness engine - 84/100 Indiavision- 4/5 Vincent of Malayalam Net - 3/5 Indiaglitz- 7/10 Times of India -3.5/5 Sify verdict- Very Good Rediff- 3.5/5 Critic Badri Parthasarathy - 3.5/5 Malayala Manorama - 3.5/5

The average rating is above 72% ... what is the calculation u are using to arrive the conclusion of 60-70% — Preceding unsigned comment added by SJInd (talk • contribs) 08:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

You can refer another page in wikipedia .. It is not at all fair to keep different standards for reviewing the sections in wikipedia for different pages. Please check the below page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memories_(2013_film)

And please go through the critical reception section and find the ratings. They have mentioned it as positive reviews for that ratings (ratings are 3, 3.5, 2.5, 3.5, 3.5). Your reviewing section can approve this as positive review for these ratings. Then please look into my additions... I have given the proofs more than enough to compare the ratings of both movies.

Then why didnt you accept the change of mixed reviews to GOOD/POSITIVE with the enough proofs from the major sites and medias. The ratings for the movie Neelakasham Pachakkadal Chuvanna Bhoomi is definitely deserves good/positive tag in critical section. Please change the mixed reviews to good/positive. I have given valid proofs from 10 different reliable medias below.

Critical Reception

The movie received good/positive reviews from most of the critics.

Moviebuzz of Sify.com rated the movie as Very Good. As per sify, any lover of genuine cinema should make sure that you take this trip! It requires patience to appreciate it fully, but deserves a viewing because films like this are hard to find. http://www.sify.com/movies/neelakasham-pachakkadal-chuvanna-bhoomi-review-malayalam-15036022.html

Famous critic Maneesh Narayanan of Indiavision TV channel gave the rating of 4 out of 5. http://www.indiavisiontv.com/2013/08/11/241911.html

Paresh Palicha of Rediff says the film is impressive and Neelakasham Pachakkadal Chuvanna Bhoomi may prove to be another turning point in the recent new wave Malayalam cinema and gave the rating of 3.5 out of 5. http://www.rediff.com/movies/review/south-review-neelakasham-pachakkadal-chuvanna-bhoomi-is-impressive/20130812.htm

Critic Badri Parthasarathy says neelakasham pachakadal chuvanna bhoomi is a triumph for confident generation and welcoming ecosystem and gave the rating of 3.5 out of 5. http://www.madaboutmoviez.com/2013/08/neelakasham-pachakadal-chuvanna-bhoomi-triumph-confident-generation-welcoming-ecosystem/

The leading malayalam daily Malayala Manorama gave the rating of 3.5 out of 5. They say NPCB offers an interesting ride. Though the film has been made with a view to entertain the youngsters, it sends good messages too. In all NPCB can be termed as "a good and different attempt" by Sameer Thahir. http://english.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/contentView.do?contentType=EDITORIAL&channelId=-1073865026&programId=11565555&contentId=14737996&tabId=1&BV_ID=@@@

Nowrunning.com gave the rating of good. http://www.nowrunning.com/movie/12057/malayalam/neelakasham-pachakkadal-chuvanna-bhoomi/review.htm

Metromatinee.com gave very good rating for the movie. The review says, this is one movie which will make you want to go on a long trip…It will make you nostalgic about your college days…It will make you want to fall in love all over again…It will make you laugh and cry…It will make you want to search yourself…What more could a movie offer. http://www.metromatinee.com/Review/Neelakasham%20Pacha%20Kadal%20Chuvanna%20Bhoomi%20Review-313-1

The leading malayalam daily Madhyamam gave excellent review for this movie. They say that the film proves that malayalam films are riding fast in the path of changes and innovation; http://www.madhyamam.com/movies/node/451

Movie Tarot's Happiness engine has scored the film at 84/100 stating that the film is designed to cater best to youngsters and it packs a definite punch.[16] Vincent of Malayalam Net gave a rating of 3/5 and said that it will be a unforgettable experience watching this movie.[17] IndiaGlitz gave a rating of 7/10, stating that "is a movie that must be watched for its solid, though diluted content."[18] Times of India rated the film as a 3.5/5, praising some of the voice acting, but questioning the relevancy of some of the character's political stances.[19] The Hindu also reviewed the film, praising the entertaining nature of the film, the acting and the script, whilst critisizing the second half of the film and its climax.[20]

❌These repeated requests are disruptive. As I've explained perhaps a million times by now, the average score is 60-70%. This indicates "mixed or average" reviews. In fact, I've only seen one site that gave it a "proper" positive rating. Also, stop vandalizing the talk page by blanking my comments and the comments of others. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 07:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Critical Reception
Neelakasham Pachakadal Chuvanna Bhoomi received generally positive reviews from critics. Movie Tarot's Happiness engine has scored the film at 84/100 stating that the film is designed to cater best to youngsters and it packs a definite punch. Vincent of Malayalam Net gave a rating of 3/5 and said that it will be a unforgettable experience watching this movie. IndiaGlitz gave a rating of 7/10, stating that "is a movie that must be watched for its solid, though diluted content." Times of India rated the film as a 3.5/5, praising some of the voice acting, but questioning the relevancy of some of the character's political stances. The Hindu also reviewed the film, praising the entertaining nature of the film, the acting and the script, whilst critisizing the second half of the film and its climax.

SJInd (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

✅ by User:Josephjames.me. Not everything has been included yet, and things that aren't ratings should not be; however, many of the others have. If too many more are added, the table will be too big (I believe it's supposed to be a maximum of ten reviews). Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 19:11, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neelakasham Pachakadal Chuvanna Bhoomi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130730154626/http://www.boxofficenoon.org/2013/07/neelakasham-pachakadal-chuvanna-bhoomi.html to http://www.boxofficenoon.org/2013/07/neelakasham-pachakadal-chuvanna-bhoomi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)