Talk:Nefertiti Bust

Reward
It says "When the bust was first discovered, no piece of quartz to represent the iris of the left eyeball was present, as in the other eye, and none was found despite an intensive search and a then significant reward of £5 being put up for information regarding its whereabouts.[29]" £5 doesn't seem a "significant" reward. Maybe the £5 is a typo? There is no way to check on the link provided. Anyone can provide another source? Maybe should remove the word significant? Using http://inflation.stephenmorley.org/ to calculate £5 from 1912 to current rate is says it is £530, which still doesn't sound "significant" for a historic quartz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:140:8000:D84F:7DD9:A689:3C50:ACB9 (talk) 22:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The "£5" are probably Egyptian Pounds and in 1912 £5 would have been a considerable sum for the average Egyptian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.53.137 (talk) 09:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Art history?
There is a lot on the history, but little on the art history here. Johnbod (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have been away from the article for some time, but I notice that my comment above was picked up, but not followed up, in the GA review. Just to be clear, the article still has virtually nothing on the role and context of the bust within Egyptian royal portraiture, which is indeed very much the focus of its current excellent presentation in Berlin, and which I would expect to take up a large part of a good article on the subject. I don't think the article meets GA standards in its current state for this reason. Johnbod (talk) 18:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The exact role and context of the bust within Egyptian royal portraiture is unknown. "The exact function of the bust is unknown, though it is theorized that the bust may be a sculptor's model."-- Redtigerxyz Talk 12:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That is not the same thing at all! Johnbod (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you please show a sample para discussing the issue in another article/webpage so I can understand what you really want to see in the article? -- Redtigerxyz Talk 13:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You are writing an article on a single artwork from a rather distant culture, but have no art historical material on the lengthy and much-discussed artistic tradition from which the object comes, which should be a major element of the article. You don't even link to our Portraiture in Ancient Egypt, which is not a bad place to start (not that they seem to link here either). Other stuff quickly found online is here and here.  No doubt there is plenty more. That the sculpture was a reference model for use in the studio seems fairly generally assumed, and might be stated more strongly. Johnbod (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

please explain WHY the statue was made in the this section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.198.227 (talk) 03:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Not the Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft
Although the translation (German Oriental Company/Society) is right, the institution (Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft (DMG)) is not correct. It was the Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft (DOG), of which one of the founders was James Simon himself, the lone sponsor of the Amarna excavation in 1912/13. The DOG was established in Berlin, as the DMG was in Leipzig. The DOG is still in Berlin.

You may find some more information about the DOG here:
 * Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft e.V.
 * German Wikipedia: Deutsche Orient Gesellschaft

--Sat Ra (talk) 09:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Background: removal of
Background is a brief paragraph about who Nefertiti was. It was added so that the reader need not claim on the Nefertiti link. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 12:47, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It wasn't removed intentionally. It was added during an edit conflict, and replaced afterwards. I'm all for a little context. Yomangani talk 13:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

First display: 1923 or 1924
There is confusion when the bust was first displayed, some sources say 1923, some 1924. 1924 is now used in the article. I am confused. Some someone find reliable references? -- Redtigerxyz Talk 15:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * This may be a reliable reference about the first display of the bust:
 * see page 286 and note 24: The bust was presented to the public in Borchardt’s text on the Nefertiti portrait, dated 1923 but published in 1924, as well as through the exhibition of the bust beginning in March; see Krauss, ‚1913-1988, p. 100
 * see also http://www.museum.de/p/p_magazin/magazin.pdf ; pages 6-7: „Die Schöne“ wurde ab 1924 im Neuen Museum der Öffentlichkeit präsentiert. („The beauty was presented to the public in the Neues Museum in 1924.)


 * I hope, this helps. A footnote could be added to explain the two dates. --Sat Ra (talk) 09:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * P. S. I am sorry, I failed to receive the work of Krauss to which is referred to so many times. While I am still working on the German version I will keep a steady eye on this important thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sat Ra (talk • contribs) 09:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. incorporated in the text. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 15:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Body of Nefertiti
Are there any photos of this that could be added? I think it would really add to the article to demonstate how it was displayed in this.RafikiSykes (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You can see a photo here. Getting copyright permission for a photo and "fair use" for this page would be rather difficult I'm afraid. Paul B (talk) 11:44, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Nofretete Neues Museum.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 5, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-05-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! — howcheng  {chat} 20:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Nefertiti Bust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100706022302/http://www.google.com:80/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hnsbuppIOEG2JqHdZ98-sZOHj-4wD9CN9MG80 to http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hnsbuppIOEG2JqHdZ98-sZOHj-4wD9CN9MG80

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Sourcecheck).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Nefertiti Bust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100105162450/http://dsc.discovery.com:80/convergence/nefertiti/history/history.html to http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/nefertiti/history/history.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100916194918/http://weekly.ahram.org.eg:80/2005/751/eg7.htm to http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/751/eg7.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120704110319/http://www.monstersandcritics.com:80/science/news/article_1473370.php/Nefertiti_s_hidden_face_proves_Berlin_bust_is_not_Hitler_s_fake to http://www.monstersandcritics.com/science/news/article_1473370.php/Nefertiti_s_hidden_face_proves_Berlin_bust_is_not_Hitler_s_fake

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

How was identification made?
This article says nothing about how the bust was identified as that of Nefertiti. Surely Thutmose didn't scrawl her name on the bottom with a stick of charcoal? She certainly resembles the image in the "household altar" photograph attached to the article, but was this carving known when the bust was discovered? Likewise, were the wall paintings depicting Nefertiti known at the time? Is there a specific cartouche on the bust that translates to her name? Was papyri found in Thutmose's workshop listing his works? Was the identification made by an assessment of clues rather than specific, irrefutable information, and therefore subject to change? I'm curious how a 3,500 year old bust was known so conclusively to have been of that specific queen. Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 16:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nefertiti Bust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008194009/https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/wash/www/nefertiti.htm to https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/wash/www/nefertiti.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

List_of_rock_formations_that_resemble_human_beings#Taiwan
Add see also List_of_rock_formations_that_resemble_human_beings. Jidanni (talk) 12:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Reference
There is a fairly ong article on the bust: https://aeon.co/essays/how-the-enigmatic-nefertiti-came-to-be-locked-away-in-germany?utm_source=pocket-newtab. 164.47.187.32 (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)