Talk:Negligible senescence

I've done some literature searching and I can find no studies supporting any of the statements in the 2nd paragraph, and planaria are not suggested as negligibly senescence organisms as far as I can tell, so, if there are no objections, I'd like to delete that paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulGNelson (talk • contribs) 22:04, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

How about this 400 year old clam? http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/10/071029-oldest-clam.html


 * Agreed, I'll put it in the list. Darmot and gilad (talk) 11:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Is it too soon to add the naked mole rat to this article? http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/01/naked-mole-rats-defy-biological-law-aging https://elifesciences.org/articles/31157

Merge
I created Negligibly senescent organism (from info found at the category), before noticing this article. i am no good at merge proposals, getting it all mixed up. as long as the information is preserved, this article has the better title.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Negligible senescence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402085711/http://8e.devbio.com/preview_article.php?ch=2&id=6 to http://8e.devbio.com/preview_article.php?ch=2&id=6
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718221530/http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/factfiles/jellies/sea_anemone_bg.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/factfiles/jellies/sea_anemone_bg.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)