Talk:Nehaj Fortress

Merger
This article and Nehaj indeed cover the same topic even though the Nehaj article is supposedly on a hill that is site of the fortress. Moreover, nearly entire contents are duplicated between the two articles. Merger appears to be the only plausible solution, although I would prefer merger to Nehaj instead, where the hill and the eponymous fortress could be covered properly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Still, the hill is not really notable by itself, and there is not much to be said about it that is unrelated to the fortress. Anyway, having Nehaj Fortress as a merge target does not preclude the coverage of the hill there. GregorB (talk) 13:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeed, a look at the List of forts supports your idea.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Cleanup
I propose splitting the existing lead section into a lead paragraph, an "Etymology" section beginning at "the name Nehaj...", and a "History" section beginning at "It was built...". Would this suffice to fix the "lead too long" issue? U. E. Aduan (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)