Talk:Nellah Massey Bailey/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 14:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

This looks an interesting article. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Review
The article is clearly written and covers an interesting topic. It is stable, 99.9% of authorship is one user, DanCherek. It is currently ranked a Start class article, but has been developed substantially since being assessed.

The six good article criteria: Overall:
 * 1) It is reasonable well written
 * The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
 * It complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable
 * It contains a references section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
 * Although there is a heavy reliance on contemporary newspaper articles, all inline citations are from reliable sources.
 * It contains no original research.
 * It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage
 * It addresses the main aspects of the topic.
 * It stays ffocused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
 * 1) It has a neutral point of view
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
 * 1) It is stable
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 1) It is illustrated with appropriate images.
 * Images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
 * Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 * Congratulations. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.-- simongraham (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review! I appreciate it. DanCherek (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)