Talk:Nenad Mišović

Untitled
Yap, one minute after I published article, hidden spying-cop jump on my back (on my work) and want to delete article. Very good impression for new users/editors of Wikipedia. And the most comic, reason for deletion: article is NEWS and Wiki is not place for news. So, if someone don't like some topic, he can coldly make proposal for deletion under some excuse. So, if I don't like new model of Dell XPS laptop I can say: it is news, so it should be deleted. Of course, every new thing produced, IS NEWS, in any way you write about it: it will be news. It is the same when someone is judged to life sentence and then I write about it in category for it, anyone can try to delete article under excuse that it is news. So, when I wrote here about man sentenced to life in prison of course I will explain why it is happened. Instead to write several words I tried to make longer article in order that readers understand what is in question. Then deleter saw that I put external links for newspaper and he remembered that article can be deleted because "it is news".

Beside it, I want to mention that some people are beaurocratic or they get professional deformation when they do long time the same job, so I would like to ask is it possible to see somewhere how many pages this member proposed for deletion? Some people forget that someone spend time to create article and it should be supported by community but new people can just see how someone already after one minute controlled what I wrote and proposed for deletion. aleluja. Fidel Castro don't control so fast and so much. But he also misuse anything to move something what HE (oh his majesty) don't like. So, when deletion is in question, I am strongly against one word explanation why article should be deleted. That's beaurocratic behaviour and it hit people. I didn't create here million articles and of course I am angry when someone jump on my work and do something against it. So, let new people to adapt themselves, don't jump on their back so fast and with short explanation.

As I said, many articles can be seen as news, new products, new judge punishments, etc. But I saw category for such articles, so I thought I can write more articles about people from my country who finished in prison. Then move category and all such articles if you have moral problems with such topics. In this way I spent my time for nothing. Better to write in some other Pedia where exist less beaurocracy and more freedom.

And one more thing, I thought that people should contribute and fill up article with more information, but I see here only deletion or editor must alone fill up article. So if someone think that article is bad, he should change it, but I see ijn rules that editor alone should improve it. How can I improve something what is fiction in head of man who proposed article for deletion? I said that many things are news, if someone want to see it like news and to make proposal for deletion. --Predic (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Copy edit
I saw this on the WP:GOCE list and have given it a thorough rewrite for what it's worth, but still think it fails WP:NOT. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I now found several more refs which I believe demonstrate notability; everything's now cited so I believe it satisifes WP:BLP requirements. I am watchlisting. Gonzonoir (talk) 12:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)