Talk:Nenjil Or Aalayam/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Will look at this shortly, I've been busy with Sinatra!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Couldn't see much wrong with it, I fixed 5 or 6 things myself I think to save you doing it. Good effort.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * @Dr. Blofeld Thank you very much, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 03:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)