Talk:Neo-Historism

Moving article to "Historicising architecture after 1945" or "Classical architecture after 1945"
I'd like to move this article to a more consent-driven article or something that doesn't suggest a fixed name for the movement.

I initially created the article "Neo-Historism" before and it was deleted due to thin source material. So I'd suggest we're giving it a less "pretentious" name to evaluate the movements and development of historicising and classical architecture after the year 1945, the harshest break in the history of architectural evolution. Do you prefer the title "Historicising architecture after 1945" or "Classical architecture after 1945", or could you suggest something else? Cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I just realized that in parallel to this article, the article New Classical Architecture was created. Let's move content there and leave a redirect, it seems like a more appropriate term. Cheers Horst-schlaemma (talk) 22:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)