Talk:Neo Tokyo (disambiguation)

User:Patar knight - please see WP:SIA and WP:MOSDAB - they are not explicitly not dab pages, just list articles. I'm CSDing again. If you object to the conversion to an SIA, then the dab redirect isn't the place to object, but at the SIA. Whilst this is an SIA, this redirect is incorrect. Widefox ; talk 12:47, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Readers and most editors don't care or know the difference between a DAB and a SIA; and MOSDAB does not have anything to say about redirects from one to the other. CSD is only for uncontroversial deletions; and an admin declining your request means it's not that. Simply reapplying the CSD tag is abuse of process. Take it to RFD. Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * See MOS:DABNOTINDEX "Set index articles are not disambiguation pages and do not have to follow the style outlined on this page." and WP:NOTDAB "A set index article is not a disambiguation page." (original emphasis). Take the example HMS Albatross it does not have a dab redirect . Every dab I've converted to SIA has had the dab redirect deleted. None of the other admins objected this week, last week etc. This sort of misunderstanding that SIAs are somehow dab pages (they're not) makes me want to be an admin just to make dab cleanup easier. Although it's a WP:CLUE here, so I could just CSD again and consider you should get further opinions or just leave for another admin, I will list this at the dab project and RfD as admins should be able to follow the simple difference between SIA and dab. This is uncontroversial maintenance, nothing to see here. Regards  Widefox ; talk 18:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Patar knight the comment "Target is actually IMO a DAB page; even if it's technically not, it's functionally the same and thus a valid redirect". This isn't the right place for that discussion - it should be at Neo Tokyo. It is either a dab or not. If the SIA is not contested, then this dependent redirect is, by definition, incorrect and should be deleted as an invalid dependent page. Widefox ; talk 20:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Discussion is at Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016 September 24, I've incorporated the new items in the dab (commented out) until the RfD is closed. Widefox ; talk 15:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)