Talk:Neocons

Stub?
Can someone explain to this relative newcomer why this article is considered a "stub"? It serves mainly to refer the reader to "Neoconservatives" (actually "Neoconservativism") but I think it adds value by stating that the term "Neocons" itself is usually used in a critical way. Expanding it would no doubt duplicate (or perhaps contradict) the information to be found at "Neoconservatives," neither of which is desirable, so inviting its expansion through the "Stub" label seems counterproductive to me. I also find it interesting that searching on "Neocon" refers the reader to the "Neoconservativism" article while adding an "s" brings the reader here. Does that make sense? Zeutron 21:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't it make more sense to merge this with the neoconservatives article and add a note in said article noting the use of "Neocons" in a derogatory manner? Etcher 04:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)