Talk:Neoptera

Untitled
I don't think that's a honey bee in the picture labelled "honey bee" (Hymenoptere2.jpg) - I'm no expert but it looks more like a solitary bee, perhaps a megachilid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.204.118 (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
(written by User:Platyhelminthes at 21:36, 4 March 2008) Substituted at 20:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

The first split seems unconsistent with its source
I didn't fix as I don't understand a lot in the topic, is it an error? אריקפ1111 (talk) 10:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Phylogeny
The phylogeny has been edited by User:Nikita-Kluge with the edit comment


 * "‎Nikita-Kluge talk contribs‎ Since this phylogeny is said to be "according to Kluge", I brought it to agreement with it. This phylogeny is based on the principles of Cladoendesis, according to which phylogeny is based on autapomorphies, which are characters of holophyletic taxa, and each taxon has its own name. So branches without names cannot exist. All names are used in accodance with the whole world literature and the principle of priority, but not with this or that particular web page."

I note that the statement implies that the phylogeny

a) includes the first names given to clades, whether or not these are used today, on "the principle of priority";

b) is based on "the whole world literature", i.e. is a WP:SYNTHESIS, rather than based on any specific recent source.

The opinions of other editors are invited on how this phylogeny (indeed, any phylogeny) should be constructed here on Wikipedia. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

"Phytophtires" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phytophtires&redirect=no Phytophtires] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Monster Iestyn (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)