Talk:Neosho-class monitor/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Not too much to fix here, nice work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 11:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * surrendered might be a little WP:EGGy. Maybe "just over a month after Union forces captured the city after a two month long siege." or something like that (though that's a little wordy).
 * Done.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The last sentence in the short para in the service section, with "David Campbell 17 August 1873[5] for $13,600.[2]" - that looks rather ugly. Might you move the DANFS ref to the previous sentence and then replace the Gibbons ref with a footnote like "For the date and location of sale, see Neosho, DANFS; for the price, see Gibbons, p. 57."
 * Done.
 * One cn tag needs to be addressed.
 * Done.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ping.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)