Talk:Nepal at the 2012 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR   15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "Nepal competed at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London" - no need to embolden Nepal here
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 20:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * "Overall He finished 59th out of 75 competitors overall" - error
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 20:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * " in a heat led by Micronesia's Kerson Hadley" - unlink Micronesia here as it's already been linked
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 20:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Couldn't find any issues worthy of placing this on hold, so I'll pass it now as it meets the GA criteria on the basis that it is comprehensive and well written. JAG UAR   20:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)