Talk:Neptali Gonzales

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --MLauba (talk) 15:26, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Question about the "Sr."
I was about to move this to Neptali Gonzales when I realized that Neptali Gonzales II exists -- no issue on who is the primary subject (the father is more notable), but the question is if whether it's proper to call him "Neptali Gonzales, Sr." unless there's a "Neptali Gonzales, Jr." which should not be Neptali Gonzales II. – HTD  ( ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens. ) 08:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Few issues regarding this article.
I've edited this article to fit WP:MOSWTW a bit more. I still have some concerns about the article though, namely:
 * The article seems to rely heavily on the biography written by the Senate of the Philippines. This makes the article unverifiable and the information may be unreliable.
 * I've seen that there are large parts of this article plagiarized from the aforementioned source. There are large chunks of the article that ripped that entire page word per word.

Before editing, I've noticed that the page quite glorified the Gonzales. I've fixed most of the issues, but there may still be some discrepancies. If anyone could help improve this article, that would be great.

Warm regards. from Chlod! (talk | contribs) 03:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)