Talk:Nestopia

Untitled
I added the NPOV tag: this reads like a bloody advertisement. Userpie 20:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I edited the article so it doesn't sound like an 'advertisement'. If people would, cite the sections that sound like an advertisement so we can discuss alternate wordings. --ShaunMacPherson 08:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * this may be true, but it sounds like an ad "At its current state of development, Nestopia is arguably the most polished and advanced NES emulator ever written." 24.252.89.123 (talk) 02:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Rationale for screenshot?
Previously on TFD:
 * 1) Emulator fur, a fair use rationale template for non-free images' description pages, has been nominated for deletion because the Purpose that it applies to image description pages doesn't satisfy the nominator.
 * 2) A non-free screenshot from this article used Emulator fur.
 * 3) I removed the screenshot, with an edit summary (What does the non-free screenshot of Super Mario Bros. add to readers' understanding of the article?)
 * 4) undid my edit without a non-automatic edit summary.

Per Non-free content criteria #1, what does the image say about the emulator that can't be said with original text? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 12:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Where is the source for Nestopia being cycle accurate?
The only source links to Bsnes which is a Snes emulator not nes. Removing that claim until correct sources are given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.176.237.2 (talk) 11:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Duplicated info in the infoboxes of Nestopia UE and Nestopia
Someone caused the infoboxes of Nestopia UE and Nestopia to be almost the same, indicating Nestopia still releases new versions and has a GitHub repo. Please either revert it or delete Nestopia's infobox altogether. Cardace (talk) 11:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)