Talk:Netpolitik

wouldn't the same criticism apply to noopolitik? if an entry for noopolitik exists, I think an entry for netpolitik should exist as well. though perhaps it should be added to the neologisms page.


 * Looking at Noo, Net, and Real politik, I'd actually reccomend merging them all into Realpolitik, since Noo and Net are forks or interpretations of Real, unless I'm forgetting my poli sci classes? Mbisanz (talk) 21:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks for responding Mbisanz - the point of noo/net is that they differ (are in contrast to) realpolitik. so merging them would only make sense if there was a page for politik, which included different types of politik (real, noo, net, cyber, media, etc.). so the question is: have a page for politik which includes different types, or have a separate page for each type of politik? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stequoianie (talk • contribs) 05:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * No, your right, I just didn't think these splinters of poli thought would ever be more than dictionary defs on their own. But looking over google and google news, there does appear to be a body of literature at least for Netpolitik that would bear a good article.  Happy editing.  If you ever need help with formatting, etc feel free to drop me a line. Mbisanz (talk) 05:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)