Talk:Network (comics)

Merge with Network (Marvel Comics)
This page should be merged with Network (Marvel comics) Sophosmoros 03:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)sophosmoros
 * Merge proposal tags added to both articles, survey/discussion sections added below... --Mrph 00:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Survey

 * Merge --Mrph 00:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge --JB Adder | Talk 12:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge --Sophosmoros 22:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Some of the info on Network (Marvel Comics) seems to refer to the other Network anyway...?! --Mrph 00:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Working off previous examples (eg Quill (comics), Puck (comics), Scorpio (comics), Silk Spectre), the merging of two or more comic book characters from the same imprint, series or franchise (mostly franchise) is common (maybe even required) practice. If anyone from Wikiproject Comics could correct me about this, that would be great. --JB Adder | Talk 12:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Techno- / Cyber- ?
What is the difference between a technopath and a cyberpath? The wiki article on technopathy lumps them together as the same thing. Applejuicefool 14:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Content from Talk:Network (Marvel Comics)
How do you know that it's the same Network from Moon Knight? The costume looks diferent to me although my memory is hazy on the subject. In adition, there are many charcters in the Marvel Universe alone who use the name Network? Could two diferent characters be getting mixed up?

-Yeah, this is totally not the Network from the Hellbent, who looked different, had different powers, was a villain and died. I'm faily certain this is an all-new character.

Perhaps this page should be merged with the Network (comics) page Sophosmoros 03:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)sophosmoros

Fair use rationale for Image:Network-comics.jpg
Image:Network-comics.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)