Talk:Neural control of limb stiffness/Georgia Tech Intro to Neuroscience

- 1. Quality of Information: 2 2. Article size: 2 3. Readability: 0 (the equations are well defined. Lay audience might find it hard to comprehend). 4. Refs: 2 5. Links: 2 6. Responsive to comments: 2 7. Formatting: 2 8. Writing: 2 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 10. Outstanding?: 0 (Lack some important aspects of neurobiology. Try and find more literature that has neurobiological aspect of your topic) _______________ Total: 16/20 Adewale3 (talk) 06:27, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

1. Quality of Information: 1 (Are there any more articles more recent than 2010?)

2. Article Size: 2

3. Readability: 1 (It may be a bit confusing for users not familiar with the jargon.)

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 1 (the organization is a bit off, but it appears you have fixed it since Nov 19. I'm not sure if this is intentional, but you're most updated article has your equations all numbered 1. You may want to leave the numbering off for stylistic purposes.)

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2

(Very detailed. I like the use of equations and how you sectioned the page.)

Total: 17/20 LeilaniBarry (talk) 08:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

- 1. Quality of Information:2

2. Article size:2

3. Readability: 1 (The main issue here is the language. You have to be wary of using technical language or "math speak".)

4. Refs:2

5. Links:2

6. Responsive to comments:2

7. Formatting:2

8. Writing:2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2

10. Outstanding:1 (Pretty cool article, but needs to be more relatable for people outside your field.)

Total:   18    out of 20

Christopherjbaker1993 (talk) 22:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Adewale3- Thank you for the comments. I will try to make the equations section easier to read and more approachable and I will add information pertaining to the neurobiology of stiffness modulation.

LeilaniBarry- Thanks for the comments! I will try to find some more recent articles (2011-2013) if I can find them. Additionally, I will try to reduce the jargon that I used in my writing. Also, I noticed the formatting issue with the equations and have fixed that problem. Thank you for pointing it out.

Christopherjbaker1993- Thanks for the feedback. Your comments were very helpful. I will work to reduce the "math speak" that I have used and will attempt to make the article more relatable. I already attempted to make the article relatable by adding a section about possible applications, but I will work to improve the article further in that regard. Thank you. Harrisonbartlett (talk) 03:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Everyone, thank you for the helpful comments. I have attempted to implement the changes that you suggested. If you find that the changes that I have made to the article do not address your concerns, please contact me via my user page or by leaving a note on this talk page. Thank you again for all of your help towards making this article part of the wikipedia community. -Harrison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrisonbartlett (talk • contribs) 04:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)